Tuesday, March 31, 2015
Charlie Hebdo is our friend: French journalist Zineb El Rhazoui speaks in Chicago
On March 26th the Alliance Francaise de Milwaukee presented a webinar to a small audience about the Paris-based satirical weekly paper Charlie Hebdo. It inspired me to wear a "Je suis Charlie" button for the first time. Amidst news of fresh attacks on civilians in the Arab world & renewed threats against outspoken journalists everywhere, Charlie Hebdo stands tall - he just keeps on publishing.
For those of you living in a cave, the offices of Charlie Hebdo (relaunched in 1992) were brutally attacked on January 7, 2015. Two radical Islamist gunmen killed twelve Charlie Hebdo staff-members as well as a pair of French policemen. The state had sent police officers to guard the premises following a firebombing in late 2011.
As a matter of fact this event, hosted by the University of Chicago & co-sponsored by Alliance Francaise & the French consulate of Chicago, was postponed due to terrorist threats against the speaker, Charlie Hebdo's religion correspondent Zineb El Rhazoui. Addressing a large & lively academic crowd in the Windy City in late March, Rhazoui gave a moving & uncompromising defense of free speech - even when its fruits offend some readers.
Arguing that the so-called Free World cannot ban "blasphemy" without undermining the principle of freedom itself, Rhazoui asserted that papers like hers have a duty to criticize society's foibles & delusions. Their work is meant to make readers feel uncomfortable, she explained.
Hired by Charlie Hebdo in 2009, when the revolutionary Arab Spring movement was in progress, Rhazoui noted that an Algerian native named Mustafa was killed in the January attack simply because he worked for the paper. A native of Morocco herself, Rhazoui was forced into exile as a result of her feminist activism & outspoken stance against the regime of that kingdom on Europe's doorstep. She said that the large & diverse Muslim community in France, including the policemen Abdul who was also killed that sad day in January, is well established but only partially integrated into French society.
Rhazoui is fearless. Having studied Islam for 16 years, she wrote a biography about the Prophet Muhammed. She claimed that the Koran does not forbid depictions of the Prophet - despite what ideological extremists may claim when justifying the assassination of political cartoonists or documentary filmmakers (e.g. Theo van Gogh in Holland in 2004). State religion, such as is found in Saudi Arabia or the fledgling ISIS "caliphate" in Syria & Iraq, necessarily becomes oppressive & barbaric, she argued.
Rhazoui took to task those newspapers (including some commenters in The New York Times & The Washington Post) that criticized Charlie Hebdo. She said that by suggesting Charlie Hebdo's editors provoked the January massacre by publishing crude assaults on Islam, these Western papers failed to grasp the fundamental value of a free press. She said that many people have a misinformed image of the Parisian paper, noting that there have been only three covers featuring anti-Islamist-extremist subjects in its 30-odd years of existence. The first cover after the attack featured a brilliantly simple cartoon of Muhammed holding a sign reading "All is forgiven, I am Charlie."
Calling the Kouachi brothers, the self-described "Muslim" gunmen who murdered her colleagues, merely "stupid," Rhazoui instead blamed the hateful ideology that inspired them. Yet she also displayed compassion towards the fanatical killers, forgiving them for the attack on fellow French citizens. Charlie Hebdo's circulation jumped from 10,000 to over 200,000, as support from media & free-speech advocates poured in from around the globe. An impassioned Rhazoui lamented the loss of her "intelligent" colleagues at the hands of armed zealots.
The French reporter, whose English is quite good, was introduced by University of Chicago law professor Geoffrey Stone, who reminded the audience that free expression is important because, in part, it helps further democracy by requiring tolerance & civility. Would-be censors dwell in high places in every society, Stone noted. They must be resisted constantly, even in the USA.
As Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis wrote, "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." And he wrote this: "It is the function of free speech to free men from the bondage of irrational fears." That's why I'm proud, as an American born in West Germany, to display my "Je suis Charlie" button.
Friday, February 13, 2015
Rock Scribes in Wonderland: A tsunami of music-related memoirs delivers few hits
Reviewing
There Goes Gravity: A Life in Rock and Roll by Lisa Robinson (Riverhead Books: New York, NY, 2014 - 361 pp.); and especially
Everything Is an Afterthought: The Life and Writings of Paul Nelson by Kevin Avery (Fantagraphic Books: Seattle, WA, 2011 – 495 pp.).
- Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye (1953)
Part
One: The Ongoing Tsunami of Musical Memoirs
In sync with general nonfiction publishing trends, over the past decade a tsunami of memoirs by rock stars - and now rock critics - have flooded the bookstores and libraries of America. A precious few of them almost qualify as literature, such as poet/singer Patti Smith's Just Kids, winner of the 2010 National Book Award for Nonfiction. Others range from the insightful, such as Pete Townshend's memoir Who I Am (2012), to the amusing, including Keith Richards' Life (2010, co-authored by James Fox).
Most
of these books, however, are either dull, self-aggrandizing or superficial,
such as Rolling Stone writer/editor Rob Sheffield's 2010 teenaged
reminiscences, Talking with Girls about Duran Duran. A curious music
fan, I've strained my eyes and bored my brain on too many of them already.
Roaming from A to Zevon (Crystal Zevon published a generous biography of
her ex-husband Warren called I'll Sleep When I'm Dead in 2007), I've
bought or borrowed a bookshelf load of these titles. I've read or scanned them
eagerly, hoping to glean some nuggets of wisdom.
Yet
I rarely find even a surprising turn of phrase between their pretty covers.
Save yourself the disappointment: in most cases your time would be better spent
listening to a good record instead. Lisa Robinson's There Goes Gravity: A
Life in Rock and Roll, for example, was a slog. I lost interest in
that one early on. Mercifully, however, there are exceptions, including Everything
Is an Afterthought: The Life and Writings of Paul Nelson, Kevin Avery's
hybrid biography & annotated anthology.
Titles
calculated to grab attention are surefire signs of desultory content. Willie
Nelson passes a thin weak joint in Roll Me Up and Smoke Me When I Die:
Musings from the Road (2012 - sample aphorism: “If it ain't broke, break
it!”). Parliament/Funkadelic icon George Clinton offers Brothas
be, yo like George, ain't that funkin' kinda hard on you? (2014, written
"with" Ben Greenman), a title that pushes this mercenary trick into
the realm of the clownish and absurd. Most musicians and publishers, however,
play it safe. For example, ex-Sonic Youth bassist Kim Gordon calls
her freshly released memoir Girl in a Band (February 2015).
Even
the enigmatic Bob Dylan and that busy Pono-inventor Neil Young
got in the game. Both Young and Dylan arguably illuminate less about themselves
in these pages than their best songs and recordings do. The magic conjured by
the music is gone. Too many stories lie dead on the page, roadkill on the
authors' Lost Highway of memory. Comparing a late passage from Young's prosaic Waging
Heavy Peace (2012) to one from Dylan's more poetical Chronicles, Volume
One (2004) gives a flavor of each author's approach. Using the weather as
metaphor, they explain incidents from their rambling lives:
"We
played Panama City, Clearwater, Hollywood, Biloxi, Mobile, Pensacola, then we
headed north to Farm Aid in Milwaukee. Farm Aid was a departure from our
normal shows on that tour because of the forty thousand people and a stadium,
but it was a good 'un! It's all about the music. If the music soars and you
feel good, then the show is good. If for whatever reason the music does not
soar, then it is not a good show. There is no way to tell what it will be like.
It's like the weather." (- Neil Young)
"The
folk music scene had been like a paradise that I had to leave, like Adam had to
leave the garden. It was just too perfect. In a few years' time a shit storm
would be unleashed. Things would begin to burn. Bras, draft cards, American
flags, bridges, too -- everybody would be dreaming of getting it on. The
national psyche would change and in a lot of ways it would resemble the Night
of the Living Dead. The road out would be treacherous, and I didn't know where
it would lead but I followed it anyway. It was a strange world ahead that would
unfold, a thunderhead of a world with jagged lightning edges." (- Bob
Dylan)
Given
all the speculative hogwash and outright bullshit that's been written about
them, you can't blame Young and Dylan for trying to set the record straight.
But by offering their own versions of events, their own artistic
interpretations, they nevertheless can't stake a claim to the whole truth.
Readers, like sceptical detectives, have no obligation to buy anybody's story.
Besides, we music fans are complicit in the bamboozlement that surrounds all
popular art. Betrayed by our own psychological needs, we're trapped in a
process of archetype-sharing that C.G. Jung called the collective
unconscious. As a result, we persistently prefer the mythology surrounding our favorite
rock 'n' roll gods to the less glamorous truth.
Adding
to the degradation of pop culture, casual rock fans nowadays are mostly fed
poisonous pablum by the corporate drones and media flacks who hawk the
predictable music and promote the disposable stars (viz. the hit
televised debacle American Idol and its ilk). Like drunken ancient Greek
devotees of the party-god Dionysus, too many fans swallow the
lullaby lies perpetuated by those who run Big Media and their partners, mainly
the few remaining major record label groups.
Viv Albertine, co-founder of
the pioneering all-female British punk band The Slits, opens her frank
memoir Clothes, Clothes, Clothes, Music, Music, Music, Boys, Boys, Boys
(2014) with a refreshing admission: "Anyone who writes an autobiography is
either a twat or broke. I'm a bit of both." Indeed, the drastic decline in
revenue from compact-disc sales and print magazine advertising in the early
21st-century Internet economy may have driven musicians - as well as music journalists
- to this. Their agents probably advised them that it's more lucrative to write
tell-all books rather than cheaply downloaded songs or meager articles and
reviews.
Times
are tough in Old Media Land. The popular video website YouTube and the
classified-ad behemoth Craigslist have drawn millions of young eyeballs
away from television and print newspapers. Radio broadcasting has morphed into
online custom jukebox services such as Pandora, while
"narrowcasting" services like SiriusXM has a satellite that
beams out hundreds of channels to Earth from space. The ever weirder World
Wide Web has become a data-gathering electronic flea market of global
proportions.
The
once ubiquitous Top Forty pop radio format collapsed in the Nineties,
fragmenting into a dozen demographic pieces that Clear Channel
Communications was happy to buy up and monopolize. Aside from broadcasting
a few music awards shows on network television, no traditional broadcaster can
draw an audience of millions together simultaneously to hear a variety of music
anymore. That may be democratic progress of a sort, but much has been lost
along the way to the Big Brotherly digital Shangri-La that plagues us
today.
Nostalgia
among Baby Boomers and, increasingly, Gen-Xers, may be impelling publishers to
glut the market with lightweight tomes by musicians and other members of the
music-industrial complex. By contracting ghostwriters to do the heavy lifting,
semi- literate or simply lazy rock stars can avoid embarrassing themselves. So
what did I expect? To hope for more from musicians, too few of whom qualify as
poets or even wordsmiths, seems naive of me in retrospect. Writing creative
non-fiction, after all, is a mode of storytelling less suited to myth-making
than is songwriting.
Good
songs - like good poetry - evoke associations, whereas good prose must describe
things in detail. Singers can exploit listeners' natural tendency to fill in
the gaps via the miracle of imagination in a way that writers cannot. Prose is
a different species of language than poetry. Effectively communicating and
interpreting facts, as good journalism always does, demands linguistic
discipline and a devotion to the perceptible truth that even few writers
possess. Stirring emotions through symbol, sound, rhythm and metaphor - as good
poets and songwriters do - is a rarer skill still.
Now
that some accomplished music writers have joined the burgeoning parade of
memoirists, things are getting interesting. The results run the gamut, of
course, because some journalists and critics are more probing, more
self-revealing than others.
On one end of the spectrum, we have Lisa Robinson's gossipy yet dull There Goes Gravity: A Life in Rock and Roll (2014). Raised by leftist Jewish parents in New York, Robinson claims that she fell into writing about rock 'n' roll in the late Sixties primarily because her husband Richard was in the business. Robinson may be playing modest. After all, she had the chutzpah to pull off a career writing - on both sides of the Atlantic - as well as talking (she once hosted a syndicated radio show) about rock music.
Even
so, you don't get the sense that a lowbrow gig publicizing pop stars was her
dream job. Robinson's work lacks a sense of mission. Her memoir betrays a
perfunctory, at times deadpan, distance from her subjects. She lacks dimension
and depth when discussing even the music that moved her. This is about as
engaged and profound as Robinson gets in There Goes Gravity:
"The
Clash came along and musically smacked me in the face. Joe Strummer was
the most exciting live performer I'd seen in ages. He was manic, hoarse, angry
. . . [T]he Clash, at that moment, made everything that came before seem
obsolete. This band mattered. And, as is always the case with any new music, it
fulfilled a need that no one even realized was there until it was there, in
front of them. Right band, right place, right time."
This
string of cliches and hyperbole sounds so insincere, so devoid of gravitas,
that her words just drift away. Her blasé tales of monster rockers on the road,
especially Led Zeppelin and The Rolling Stones in the Seventies,
failed to ignite anything in this reader's head. It comes as no surprise, then,
when she admits that her favorite singer is Frank Sinatra, a safe retro
choice beloved by dwindling millions.
Although
a gifted jazz vocalist, Sinatra became a purveyor of sentimental schmaltz-pop,
a musical sound that rock 'n' roll had rendered obsolete by 1965. Desperate to
maintain his cool image during the post-JFK demise of his throwback Rat
Pack, Ol' Blue Eyes married a much younger Mia Farrow that year. But
that move just made him seem creepy.
Yes,
the 80-something Tony Bennett, Sinatra's old rival, can make a
Grammy-winning album of standards with 20-something Lady Gaga. But
Bennett still stopped being hip circa 1963. Like the now pamphlet-thin Rolling
Stone magazine that touts his and Gaga's recordings, Bennett has
experienced severe artistic shrinkage in recent decades.
When
will music journalists, editors and demanding fans awaken? Are we too far down
the gadget-strewn road to ruin to witness a renaissance of rock-music culture?
This stuff is too important to be relegated to obscure blogs and scholarly
journals, where most of the serious writing about popular music has migrated.
Footnoting academic enthusiasts rarely write in a way that's accessible to most
rock fans.
So
what was it like in the old days? Were things really any better in the Sixties
and Seventies? In many ways, they were. And the saga of Paul Nelson provides
the proof.
Part Two: Paul Nelson & the Hipster Revolution in American Culture
(1960-72)
Spread
into the mainstream by jazz players Miles Davis and Chet Baker;
film actors Marlon Brando and James Dean; Beat writers Jack
Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg; social satirists Lenny Bruce, Mike
Nichols & Elaine May; and especially by such soul, folk/rock and
pop musicians as Ray Charles, Bob Dylan and The Beatles,
the intelligent hipster revolution represented a vital cultural metamorphosis.
Hip
artists pushed America from the uptight early Fifties towards the groovy late
Sixties. Exported through such cultural products as Hollywood movies, hit
records and subversive books, the cool revolution spread around the globe. In
his seminal 1994 study of the Fab Four, Revolution in the Head: The Beatles'
Records and the Sixties, British author (and onetime New Musical Express
editor) Ian MacDonald presents his thesis about the social ramifications
of that band's unprecedented popularity:
"The
true revolution of the Sixties -- more powerful and decisive for Western
society than any of its external by-products -- was an inner one of feeling and
assumption: a revolution in the head. Few were unaffected by this and, as a
result of it, the world changed more thoroughly than it could ever have done
under merely political direction. It was a revolution of and in the
common man; a revolution (as Aaron Copland, author of the eponymous
fanfare, observed) whose manifesto -- its vices as much as its virtues, its losses
as well as its gains, its confusions together with its lucidities -- is
readable nowhere more vividly than in The Beatles' records. In effect, the
'generation gap' which opened in the Fifties turned out not to be a quarrel
between a particular set of parents and children but an historical chasm
between one way of life and another."
One
person whose mind was blown into enlightenment by this cultural revolution was a critic
named Paul Nelson. Like his hero Bob Dylan, he was a small-town
Minnesotan, born in January 1936 in Warren, a remote Red River Valley town of
1,500 near the Canadian border. His father was a Ford automobile and J.I. Case
tractor franchise dealer; his mother steeped him in a strict hellfire-based
evangelical Lutheranism. Young Paul loved books, movies and music, but his
hometown had neither a bookstore nor a record store.
Nelson
started writing for his high school newspaper, turned on by journalism teacher
Mary Lou Sullivan. He received a scholarship to St. Olaf College in
1954, but got expelled for anti-ROTC passivity. Already a rebel, he
sabotaged his psychological screening exam for the military draft by
emphasizing his folknik alienation from Eisenhower-era American
militarism. Moving to Minneapolis in 1956, he soon met his fate.
In
1959 Nelson befriended a mediocre Twin Cities coffeehouse musician named Bobby
Zimmerman, apotheosized in New York just four years later as the blue-eyed
Jewish genius Bob Dylan. In 1960 Nelson co-founded The Little Sandy
Review, a tiny yet influential folk-music proto-fanzine turned journal. The
publishers eventually sold it to Barret Hansen, whose post-folkie radio-show
host alter ego was the satirical Doctor Demento.
You
can watch the mustachioed Paul Nelson in a 1995 interview featured early in No
Direction Home (2005), Martin Scorsese's riveting documentary about
Dylan's rise to fame. Nelson tells a funny story about a bizarre confrontation with
the 19-year-old Dylan, who'd stolen a couple dozen rare folk records from him
one weekend.
Nelson
got his start in professional commercial journalism in 1962 by writing film and
other arts reviews for the Minneapolis Daily Herald. He produced Blues,
Rags and Hollers (1963), the first album by his friends Koerner, Ray
& Glover. Paul migrated to New York City in '63, riding the crest of
the Folk Revival wave by landing a job as managing editor of the authoritative
folk-music magazine Sing Out!
Two
years later, Nelson broke with the hidebound folk traditionalists by applauding
Dylan's abbreviated electric set at the July 1965 Newport Folk Festival.
Nelson's next article for Sing Out! was written just four days after
that legendary performance. In a sort of personal manifesto, he explained
his sudden resignation as editor: “I choose Dylan, I choose art. I will stand
behind Dylan and his 'new' songs, and I'll bet my critical reputation (such as
it may be) that I'm right.”
Decades
later Nelson echoed his high opinion of early Dylan when discussing with Americana
singer/songwriter Lucinda Williams his disdain for topical songwriting.
Nelson praised "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll," a topical (or
so-called protest) track from The Times They Are A-Changin' (1964):
“That's my favorite because he really makes you feel for that person rather
than preaching at you. Those are the best kind, where you feel the person and
then you feel the larger picture, as well.”
An
ambitious and respected critic, Paul Nelson started freelancing for periodicals
ranging from The New York Times to The Village Voice to Penthouse.
He became the New York representative for Rolling Stone (RS)
circa 1969, when that quasi-counter-cultural biweekly was still based in San
Francisco. Nelson later served as RS's record-review editor (1979-83).
Then
his career took an odd detour. He toiled as an East Coast publicist and A&R
man for Mercury Records from 1971 to 1975, signing and promoting such
artistically successful yet unprofitable acts as The New York Dolls.
"Five good years, five bad years. The same five years," Nelson
quipped. “My heart goes out to the hopeful sounds,” he said apropos of the Dolls. Nelson gave this laconic summary of his dilemma at Mercury Records:
“Two rock & rollers in New York against twenty bookkeepers in Chicago.”
In a published piece about The New York Dolls, Nelson rails against the growing trend of empty corporate rock. Though written in the mid-Seventies, he might be talking about today:
“Corporation rock & roll, wherein musicians like Bachman-Turner-Overdrive
are more gray-flanneled than the businessmen who kowtow to them, is so
formularized, homogenized, and impersonal it must surely cause the death of
anything that is at all out-of-bounds, mythopoeic, and rebellious.”
A
soft-spoken gentleman bachelor (after his 1966 divorce), Nelson chain-smoked
Nat Sherman cigarillos and owned handguns. He concealed his baldness with a
brimmed woolen cap and always wore tinted glasses. Nelson became a trusted
friend to some of his favorite subjects, an impressive array of artists including
writer Kenneth Millar (better known as hard-boiled detective novelist Ross
Macdonald), musicians Jackson Browne, Rod Stewart (Paul
co-authored a book about him with Lester Bangs) and the inimitable Warren
Zevon.
“[Zevon] said to me at one point [in the mid-'80s] that he thought that
some of the things that Paul Nelson had written about his songs were better
than the songs themselves. It so struck me that a performer would say this
about a critic,” notes music journalist Jim Farber. “Not only was [Nelson] the
last person, I think, at the magazine [i.e. Rolling Stone] who was
speaking from his own voice, but each of his writers was speaking with his own
voice. Later [i.e. after 1983] it just became the voice of Rolling Stone .
. . a magazine that was becoming increasingly corporate.”
In
a 1979 letter to Warren Zevon, Nelson complained bitterly about the enervated
state of popular music: “If rock once stood for some sort of a rebellion . . .
really it now stands for complete conformity, it seems to me—outside of ten,
twelve artists: Jackson [Browne], Bruce [Springsteen], [The]
Clash, you, Neil Young . . . Power pop has proven to be the most dismal line of
Campbell Soup cans in existence. Punk rock soon became power pop and became
exactly what it was that it started out to be against supposedly.”
What
kind of a rock journalist was Nelson? Avery puts it this way: “[Charles M.]
Young cites Hunter S. Thompson's definition of gonzo journalism
as having 'intense, demented involvement' with what you're writing about. Paul
was a guy who achieved total, demented involvement with his subject matter in
that piece. Paul was the true master of gonzo, if that's a definition of
gonzo.”
But
Nelson also suffered from terrifying bouts of writer's block, stemming from his
merciless perfectionism and emotional insecurity. He felt guilty about getting
sizable advances for proposed books (including one on Clint Eastwood),
most of which were never delivered to the publishers. Obsessed with the songs
of Leonard Cohen, Chet Baker and Ralph Stanley, Nelson
listened almost exclusively to bluegrass records in the end.
He
had severe limitations – even blind spots – in his taste. For example, he
couldn't relate to African-American musicians and he despised hip-hop/rap
music. He did at least champion many obscure white artists when he had
influence in the Seventies, including Elliott Murphy, Captain
Beefheart, Jonathan Richman & the Modern Lovers, Richard
Thompson, and Doug "the Texas Tornado"
Sahm. Nelson feared getting arrested while traveling with Sahm as a
minder/manager due to the musician's penchant for smoking cigar-sized spliffs
in public.
“He was never snobbish or high-handed or pretentious about his tastes,”
said novelist Jonathan Lethem, another noteworthy friend, “but he was
always absolute about it. For him, if the magic wasn't there, end of
conversation. But when he detected the true spirit, his persistence and
patience in locating every possible manifestation was incredible . . . Paul Nelson's
life was a fierce quiet drama of devotion to culture, with a run of triumphs
along the way to a slow-motion tragedy.”
Nelson's
final years were a sad coda to an eventful life. His last freelance record
review in Rolling Stone was of a Waterboys album in 1990. He
retreated from the world of rock 'n' roll in that decade, choosing to work
instead as a curmudgeonly clerk at Evergreen Video in Manhattan. A haunting
figure that Avery aptly describes as a sort recalcitrant Bartleby the
Scrivener, the eponymous Herman Melville short-story character whose
indolent catchphrase is simply "I would prefer not to."
Having
sold his treasured first editions and accepted charity from friends in order to
survive, a sometimes paranoid Paul Nelson declined to apply for Social
Security - out of fear of being tracked down by creditors. He tried psychiatric
counseling, to no lasting effect. Like his heroes Billy the Kid and Muhammed
Ali, Nelson became a mysterious anti-Establishment icon to the rock 'n' roll
cognoscenti.
And
like his beloved fellow Minnesota-born writer F. Scott Fitzgerald, he
died in obscurity, a relic of another epoch. But Nelson died alone, fending off
eviction from his East 74th Street apartment in Manhattan, in the
summer of 2006 at age 70. The coroner listed heart disease as the cause of
death, a condition exacerbated by malnutrition. His body was discovered only
after decomposition had set in and neighbors complained about the stench.
As
Mikal Gilmore, another accomplished friend and colleague, noted: “On the
level of a friendship, he may well have been the purist artist I've known. I
think about Paul fairly often these days, and about how deepfelt his writing
was. Maybe, like Dylan, it was in those moments and places that Paul was best
able to find his heart and express it unflinchingly. I can only wonder where
all that went after he stopped writing.”
He
died nearly a decade ago, an impoverished recluse in New York City. His story
sounds incredible: the saga of a folk-music scholar turned A&R man for
Mercury Records, a writer for Rolling Stone who explained his limited
tastes with such eloquence and conviction that you could read him for pure
pleasure. You deserve to know about him, and Kevin Avery's fine book is both
overdue and unexpected.
“His writing was flinty, elliptical, and romantic, an unusual
combination. He was drawn to loners and the excluded. There was something
seductively hermetic about his work, an invitation to a closed room,” wrote
rock critic Greil Marcus about Nelson.
“I not only accept loss forever, I am made of loss.” wrote Jack Kerouac.
Nelson cites that line in a 1979 desert-island-disc tribute to Jackson Browne's
album The Pretender (1976). “Every time I hear The Pretender, it
makes me feel that it just might be possible to get out of this place.”
Paul
Nelson shared many offbeat insights with readers, such as this suggestion about
pre-concert soundchecks: “During the soundcheck, the band is perfectly relaxed,
and the playing always seems to have that something extra—perhaps lacks
something extra—that invariably strikes me as being more natural and private
and revealing (i.e. better) than the official version. I think someone should
start making live soundcheck LPs.”
Nelson's
passion for good music shines through his words. In the unedited version of his
ecstatic Rolling Stone review of Bruce Springsteen's 1980 album The
River (alluding to a book of Walker Evans photographs of Alabama
sharecropper families during the Great Depression, with a text by James Agee,
the piece is headlined “Let Us Now Praise Famous Men”) he offers this startling
comparison:
“Both Springsteen and the Clash are morally and historically committed
to the directness and honesty of rock & roll—and to what this music can
mean to those whose hearts are smoldering with anger or shame. In their Apocalypse
Now manner, the Clash come right out with it. [. . .] Next to Bruce
Springsteen, however, they sometimes seem very innocent: they still believe in
total victory.”
In
his 1975 Rolling Stone review of the country & western concept album
Red Headed Stranger (headlined “Willie Nelson's Phonographic
Western"), Paul Nelson uses a historical reference to make his point, one
that apparently had a particularly personal resonance for him:
“When Teddy Roosevelt claimed loneliness a quintessential ingredient of
our national character, he hit the psychic bull's-eye, ringing up images of
pragmatic pioneers, existential outlaws, and a long line of heroes who dreamt
of the purity of their youth even as they drew guns to eliminate it.”
Paul
Nelson deserves to be remembered - and read- by music fans. Like Bob Dylan, he
was a musical expeditionary with formidable powers of expression. As Dylan said
of Woody Guthrie: "You could listen to his songs and learn how to
live." And now, thanks to Kevin Avery (and Paul's son Mark), Nelson's
learned and instructive writing on music can be read by future generations.
[© 2015 by J.C. Mrazek]
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Fem-Rock Revolution in the Rust Belt: Racine & Kenosha's best bands are led by women
| Stephanie Vogt's Donoma attacks (photo by Paddypix |
In the cluttered forest of local music - overpopulated with pale bluesmen, human jukeboxes and dwarf folkies - a few impressive rock bands stand out like towering redwoods. Surprisingly, in Racine and Kenosha those bands all happen to be led or fronted by guitar-slinging ladies nowadays.
Less twin cities than Rust-Belt rivals, Kenosha and Racine
had a live-music scene dominated for decades by all-male groups. Today these former factory towns, set a few
miles apart on the shore of Lake Michigan, are enjoying the emergence of a
fem-rock revolution. Matching catchy
original tunes with captivating performance styles, this potent girl-gang of
four have rabid fans here. Yet they rarely
play Milwaukee venues.
Donoma (started
by Stephanie Vogt) along with Folkswagon
(led by Rachelle Van Offeren), Ash Can
School (fronted by Janet Lee Aiello) and the Jill Plaisted Band are breaking new artistic ground. Kenosha and Racine may be minor moons in the
outer cultural orbit of Chicago, but these bands are helping them shine
brightly. Here’s why they’re worth the
short drive south to catch them at a hometown bar, where there’s rarely a cover
charge.
* * *
DONOMA: Kickass
art-rock with sex appeal
Ensconced in a spacious subterranean rehearsal room and
recording studio in uptown Kenosha, Stephanie Vogt totters gorgeously on
red-ribboned high heels while shooting a video.
She’s stretching a skintight mini-dress and screaming “Santa Baby” as
though it were a kiss-off number.
Suddenly she stops, halting the uptempo hard rock, and laughs loudly.
The other members of Donoma
- Shelle Mounce (bass), Tim King (guitar), Israel Alpizar (drums) and Nick
Campolo (violin) - are having a wonderful Christmas time too. A mural of David Bowie, Freddie Mercury and
Bon Scott provides added inspiration.
The band has an attacking sound, the raw energy of artists in
rebellion. They also excel at
introspective ballads, like “Phantom Limb” from their 2010 CD A Sight of the Sun. Vogt’s brash whisky alto is as dependable as
her rhythm guitar- and keyboard-playing.
Donoma merges influences ranging from punk to Pearl Jam into a
Frankenstew of menace and compassion.
It’s sometimes pretentious, but frequently provocative.
FOLKSWAGON: Americana siren sings of heartbreak and
joy
In her forties now, Racine-based singer/songwriter Rachelle
Van Offeren has been punched in the face a few times by life. But she absorbed the blows and turned her
bruises into art. Folkswagon (est. 2008) is the perfect vehicle for her personal,
plaintive songs of love and loss.
Rachelle is a gifted guitarist and a seductive vocalist, especially when
singing close harmonies with her sister and tambourine-wielding bandmate Susan
Ma.
Folkswagon’s charm comes from the spell that Rachelle casts
with her gritty full-throated soprano.
It suggests a lonely siren hailing you towards a welcome doom. Her songs “I Don’t Know How” and “Every Once in a While” (from Folkswagon’s 2010 CD Fresh
Fruit) are minor-key masterpieces of yearning and regret. The players come from both Racine and
Kenosha. With its rootsy folk-pop Americana sound, Folkswagon would feel
at home in Nashville or Austin.
JILL PLAISTED BAND:
Soulful singer practices aikido
with acoustic guitar
Jill Plaisted’s profession is social work, but her vocation
is making music. Meanwhile, this busy
30-something singer/guitarist is working towards a master’s degree in
counseling at Concordia College. She
also practices the martial art of aikido,
whose Japanese name means the way of
mutual spirit. And that’s a fitting
description of her Kenosha-based band.
Featuring virtuoso electric guitarist Tom Barr, (ex-R&B Cadet) drummer Cy Costabile and
Bill Robbins on bass/vocals, the Jill
Plaisted Band plays mostly covers, including that groovy Wilco/Woody
Guthrie collaboration “California Stars.”
For a recent show at Henry & Wanda’s in Racine they tossed a few
Plaisted originals into every set, including the dreamy “Lost for You.” Jill’s voice is soul-deep and pure, a refined
instrument capable of going from jazzy moan to gospel cry in a heartbeat.
ASH CAN SCHOOL: Funky
pop-rock transfused by new members
Despite the fact that they’ve been on the scene for thirty
years, the married musical partners (bassist/vocalist) Dave Jude Aiello and
(singer/rhythm-guitarist) Janet Lee Aiello of Ash Can School gig harder than most local bands. And they have a vast catalog of original
songs to draw on. At a November basement
rehearsal in Kenosha, Dave joked that he selects them at random for set lists.
Rejuvenated by the addition of drummer Tom Selear and
guitarist Guy Crucianelli, the Aiellos’ band mixes tongue-in-cheek
working-class consciousness (“Lifestyles of the Poor & Unknown”) with a
quirky pop-song sensibility (“The Only Lonely One”). Echoing the Pretenders’ Chrissie Hynde, Janet
delivers the Kinks’ “Stop Your Sobbing” with conviction. Demure offstage, Janet stalks the floor,
fierce and amusing as she mocks, growls and croons. Ash Can School has released four albums on
iTunes, including 2014’s The Ever
Blooming Knockout Rose.
* * *
Why a Fem-Rock Revolution?
“[S]ometimes I think that the whole reason pop music was
invented in the first place was to vent sick emotions in a deceptively lulling
form. . . And it gave them [i.e. the
Ronettes, Shangri-Las and Crystals - early ‘60s “girl groups”] a kind of
anarchic power, which can still move us.”
- Lester Bangs, “On the Merits of Sexual Repression” (from Blondie, 1980)
Mr. Bangs, an early champion of Patti Smith, is on to
something truthful here. But in order to
explain the phenomenon of “feminine rock” - meaning good (often loud) music written and performed by women, usually in
collaboration with sympathetic men - we must dig deeper.
There are at least two reasons why females thrive at
creating rock ‘n’ roll music: (1) women
can draw upon personal experiences of social oppression, long a source of
inspiration for musical Jews and African-Americans; and (2) women are generally
skillful communicators - and, of course, effective singing is all about
conveying emotions, both simple and ambivalent, so that listeners believe the
singer and are moved by the song.
As for the success of fem-rock in southeastern Wisconsin, Fowlmouth frontman Jeff Moody credits
the Kenosha public-school system’s music programs for producing so many solid
musicians in a city of 100,000. Racine
native Victor DeLorenzo (Violent Femmes,
etc.) says he’s excited to be gigging there again. His (partly female) trio Nineteen Thirteen played at TG’s Restaurant & Pub in Kenosha
last month and is scheduled to visit George’s Tavern in Racine come April.
Longtime chronicler of the club scene in both cities, Kenosha News music columnist Paddy
Fineran complains that most rock ‘n’ roll has lost its essential
dangerousness. So he finds Donoma’s edgy
sound and charged performance style refreshing.
“Donoma is ready to break out of the local scene,” Fineran
says, noting that their second album is being produced by Mike Hoffman (EIEIO, Semi-Twang), a Milwaukeean with major-label connections.
Kicking back in jeans and t-shirt with a can of PBR, Vogt
embraces her fate. She seems unfazed by
the routine of rehearsing, collaborating with her bandmates and entertaining
fickle audiences. Donoma, after all, has
played about 350 gigs so far. The
nuisance and necessity of a day job doesn’t bother her either.
“I want to earn a living doing music full-time,” she says
confidently. A mature 25 years old, Vogt
seems ready for a career-making break.
Together with the Jill Plaisted Band, Ash Can School and Folkswagon,
Donoma is at the vanguard of a local music-scene revolution.
Imagine a stage where gender matters less than talent, where
passionate musicians play true-to-life songs for thinking adults. Then come to Racine and Kenosha and witness
this quartet of bands accomplish exactly that.
[© 2014 by J.C. Mrazek]
Links:
Photos:
| Ash Can School at TG's - Kenosha, WI (photo by D. Aiello) |
Saturday, December 6, 2014
Stitching History from the Holocaust: a Czech dressmaker's story sewn into life at the Jewish Museum Milwaukee
There’s another impressive little exhibit at the Jewish Museum Milwaukee (JMM) through February28th of next year: Stitching History from the Holocaust. It tells the heartbreaking story of a German-speaking Czech Jew named Hedvika “Hedy” Strnad & her husband Paul. At age 39, Hedy ran a successful dressmaking shop in Aussig (Usti nad Labem), Czechoslovakia. But it was 1938.
The Nazis came & swallowed the Sudetenland, with ignominious Allied blessing, destroying the Strnads & their whole Jewish community within a few terrifying years. Perhaps worse, our government did nothing to help the Strnads when they desperately sought refuge in the USA. Paul's typed letters to cousin Alvin Strnad in Milwaukee hang on the gallery walls like silent screams.
An envelope from abroad bears the dreaded SS logo, an occupying bureaucratic censor’s stamp of approval. The so-called affidavit of necessity required by Uncle Sam didn’t suffice to save the couple. They were deemed too average to deserve a precious US visa.
But this story has a sort of happy ending. In a sense, the exhibit itself is an act of redemption, a gesture of regret on behalf of a talented woman, a cultured Czech citizen who died beside her husband in the Warsaw Ghetto in April 1942. The JMM worked with the costume shop of the Milwaukee Repertory Theater in bringing several of Hedy Strnad’s designs to life.
These artists of cloth took great pains to find or create just the right fabrics, prints, colors & other details. The seamstresses' results are beautifully draped on forms: a pair of modest blue & white dresses as well as a fine modern lady’s well-shouldered grey suit. The Old World patterns that led to these retro-garments were probably illustrated by Hedy herself. Meant to be the Strnads ticket to escape the coming Holocaust, they at least inspired a moving labor of love 75 years later.
Prof. Beverly Gordon, a fashion & textile historian at the University of Wisconsin (Madison), gave a companion talk called “Hedvika Strnad & Czech Fashions of the 1930s” at a JMM luncheon on December 4th. She suggested that, given a history marked by medieval pogroms, the 1745 expulsion from Prague & the anti-semitic horror shows inflicted by central European fascists, Czech Jews could never feel entirely secure. No wonder the paranoid literary genius of Franz Kafka sprang from Prague Jewry.
Nazi documents show that 92,000 remaining Jews were deported to concentration camps & walled ghettos from Bohemia & Moravia by the Germans in 1941-42. The vast majority died during the war, either by brutal murder or criminal neglect. A lucky few (e.g. pre-war Kindertransports to England) managed to escape the genocide. The Strnads too tried hard in 1939.
Unfortunately, like many others abandoned by indifferent foreign authorities, Hedy & Paul didn’t manage to get a golden ticket to freedom. Official US records show that thousands of American refugee visas, which might have been issued to European Jews in 1939, instead went unused, making Adolf Hitler's plans for a Final Solution feasible. Imagine what a vibrant would-be immigrant like Hedy Strnad might have added to our country & its culture.
It makes me wonder about those Central American refugees that our federal government deports to dangerous places. How many more Hedy Strnads must die before we learn compassion for endangered strangers?
NOTE: This exhibit provided the occasion for a catalog about the Strnads & their plight, available for purchase on the JMM website: www.jewishmuseummilwaukee.org
[© 2014 by J.C. Mrazek]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)